Simple: little bit of this, little bit of that.Originally Posted by Fer!
Physics, I was trying to remember what were you studying a few days ago.
~
Simple: little bit of this, little bit of that.Physics, I was trying to remember what were you studying a few days ago.
Banned
Once a month or so.
Hope and Fate
Don't worry; I still don't understand it, and I was supposed to have learned all of this a year ago.It took me a while to decipher that, and I studied physics. My God.
Not that I didn't get the innuendo at first, don't get me wrong.
The scary part was that I bluffed well enough to pass. Heh...it's not like it's rocket science...oh, wait...umm, duck?
Super Moderator
Evil Republican FPS gamer
Even if it were a math test and you filled it up with those enigmatic walls of text and evil angels, you'd get an A anyways.
~
It's what I did. Gotta love being a well-worded lazy student.
w00t
Hope and Fate
Q1. A train leaves Mariehamm travelling west at 25 km/hr. Three hours later, a train leaves Göteborg travelling northeast at 40 km/hr. How long does it take for the two trains to meet, and will the diners on the second train be able to have afternoon tea before reaching Stockholm?Even if it were a math test and you filled it up with those enigmatic walls of text and evil angels, you'd get an A anyways.
A1. Under the Hegelian dialectic, the primary theory is that of the theory and its counterpart, the antithesis. This was covered by Hegel himself in the dialectic of existence - that existence as posited by pure Being, on closer examination, cannot readily be distinguished from pure Nothing. The synthesis, or unity of thesis and antithesis, is thus that of Becoming or the Created. In this instance, train A (from Mariehamm) is treated as thesis, and train B (from Göteborg) is treated as antithesis, having come into existence for the purposes of this problem purely as a counterelement to the postulated thesis. Unfortunately, Hegelian dialectic is largely a subjective method of analysis, and not a rigorous method. The postulated synthesis of the two trains meeting cannot be argued to occur from the given information, given the rhetorical nature of the dialectic.
Also, Mariehamm is on an island.
Banned
http://rapidshare.com/files/87979542...OW_FM.mp3.html
the host and founder of xenutv, also known as wise beard man, on 98.3 WOW FM in Iowa earlier today.
Evil Republican FPS gamer
Q1. A train leaves Mariehamm travelling west at 25 km/hr. Three hours later, a train leaves Göteborg travelling northeast at 40 km/hr. How long does it take for the two trains to meet, and will the diners on the second train be able to have afternoon tea before reaching Stockholm?
A1. Under the Hegelian dialectic, the primary theory is that of the theory and its counterpart, the antithesis. This was covered by Hegel himself in the dialectic of existence - that existence as posited by pure Being, on closer examination, cannot readily be distinguished from pure Nothing. The synthesis, or unity of thesis and antithesis, is thus that of Becoming or the Created. In this instance, train A (from Mariehamm) is treated as thesis, and train B (from Göteborg) is treated as antithesis, having come into existence for the purposes of this problem purely as a counterelement to the postulated thesis. Unfortunately, Hegelian dialectic is largely a subjective method of analysis, and not a rigorous method. The postulated synthesis of the two trains meeting cannot be argued to occur from the given information, given the rhetorical nature of the dialectic.
Also, Mariehamm is on an island.
I feel so ignorant at english when I read your posts. >__>
Moderator
It's okay.
I feel so ignorant at english when I read your posts. >__>
We all do.
~
Dunno when they left, so the afternoon tea part is kinda tricky.Q1. A train leaves Mariehamm travelling west at 25 km/hr. Three hours later, a train leaves Göteborg travelling northeast at 40 km/hr. How long does it take for the two trains to meet, and will the diners on the second train be able to have afternoon tea before reaching Stockholm?
A1. Under the Hegelian dialectic, the primary theory is that of the theory and its counterpart, the antithesis. This was covered by Hegel himself in the dialectic of existence - that existence as posited by pure Being, on closer examination, cannot readily be distinguished from pure Nothing. The synthesis, or unity of thesis and antithesis, is thus that of Becoming or the Created. In this instance, train A (from Mariehamm) is treated as thesis, and train B (from Göteborg) is treated as antithesis, having come into existence for the purposes of this problem purely as a counterelement to the postulated thesis. Unfortunately, Hegelian dialectic is largely a subjective method of analysis, and not a rigorous method. The postulated synthesis of the two trains meeting cannot be argued to occur from the given information, given the rhetorical nature of the dialectic.
Also, Mariehamm is on an island.
Hope and Fate
It's all German to me.
I feel so ignorant at english when I read your posts. >__>
Skullfucked the ecosystem
I can't even read, so you've all got me beat.
~
Yeah, this.It's okay.
We all do.
I only ever get it by reading 3-5 times.
Moderator
I can get it the first time through.Yeah, this.
I only ever get it by reading 3-5 times.
Then my mind shuts down and I have no way to respond.
Posting Permissions
