Threaded View

raymond2007 9/11 was an inside job and... 12th-August-2007,
16:53

Raype Old/10
Obama did it. 12th-August-2007,
16:55

Cosmic Crusher did it. 12th-August-2007,
17:32

Evans lol RAYMOND lol
Oh, and... 12th-August-2007,
18:06

Tassadar Is that really all google... 12th-August-2007,
18:43

Kazuya Mishima You all planed it and I... 12th-August-2007,
19:58

Strelok26 What year does this happened?... 12th-August-2007,
21:39

raymond2007 You people are exactly the... 12th-August-2007,
21:45

Panda Man Why hasn't Raymond been... 12th-August-2007,
23:03

Strelok26 Does this Air Crush (Or... 13th-August-2007,
09:16

Anonymous The joke thread is up there.... 13th-August-2007,
16:09

Evans Spend more money to achieve... 13th-August-2007,
22:11

Cosmic Don't you see 9/11 was part... 13th-August-2007,
22:42

Cosmic I'm sorry, how inconsiderate... 13th-August-2007,
22:53

Jimmy1829 i myself blame those darn... 14th-August-2007,
00:05

Elmdor Rizer Glanced at your site. I'm a... 14th-August-2007,
02:47

skakidd danny0990 double posted i... 14th-August-2007,
05:07

skakidd wow you were offline like... 14th-August-2007,
05:19

skakidd so danny why did you join an... 14th-August-2007,
05:24

somedude You know, this video really... 14th-August-2007,
05:44

Rekuja the fact is... Iraq + oil =... 14th-August-2007,
10:20

Evans Main reason I don't even... 14th-August-2007,
13:21

Evans Since you seem entirely... 14th-August-2007,
20:49

somedude Danny,
Are you the guy who... 15th-August-2007,
20:35

Micosil Taking the matter into... 16th-August-2007,
08:10

ArnoldaTermintr 9-11 was an inside job by... 20th-August-2007,
21:20

Evans Care to elaborate? 20th-August-2007,
21:24

Cosmic The internet did it. 20th-August-2007,
21:34

Cosmic Really, you can't help but... 20th-August-2007,
21:39

Strongbad Just feel I should point out... 21st-August-2007,
04:04

Great Mizuti Katamari Damacy!
No,... 21st-August-2007,
15:18

Elmdor Rizer Your post did wonders for it... 22nd-August-2007,
18:50
-
14th-August-2007, 18:55
#11
====
QUOTE
Money is the reason he'd be for it. Sure. But why him. Why not bill gates or donald trump? Why not someone else? Why not someone who is more closely connected to the government and loyal to the various secret and not so secret groups?
====
he's a nobody billionaire.
if they picked donald trump or bill gates and one of them spilled the beans then the accusations would be stronger. everybody knows them, killing them after they have made such an accusation would cause an uproar in the US.
===-
QUOTE
Plowing planes full of people into a crowded office complex is a whole different thing. Now you referenced Northwoods a couple times. Couldn't they have just as easily done something like that? A couple drones here, some altered news footage there, some arabs in Iraqi/afghani uniforms tossed in for good measure, the stage is set without a single death. Why 9/11, why killing civilians? It could've just as easily been staged. Or a terror attack on a government building in a major city getting blown up that was already long since evacuated, if that's what you'd prefer. They had no real reason to wipe out those people over a somewhat more "humane" method of propaganda.
As you pointed out later, there's a lot of claims about the pentagon being a rigged attack. Why not something more like that. Sure it lacks the punch of those towers, but it sure would've given a reason for war with the right press on it (I'm sure the pent attack would've gotten more attention were it not for the towers getting destroyed)
====
they wanted to go the extra mile in terms of manipulating america with fear (thats getting redundant, i know, but you keep mentioning lives as though they gave a damn)
==
QUOTE
But nobody in the building earlier that got out mentioned seeing explosives.
Nor anybody in the building during the "attacks". The equipment takes time to set up. Clearly it would've been hard for someone to get into the building with the rescue teams, set everything up, and detonate in the span of a half hour. So where and when could these explosives have been set? Demo equipment isn't exactly "toss bomb, hit button, watch it go boom!". A proper rigging can take at least a couple hours. And it's not exactly easy to hide that kind of thing. Not to mention if it were a demo job, the people involved in "pressing the buttons" were probably inside the building or not far from it. I find it hard to believe that nobody saw a single one, or that someone would suicide bomb a building full of people just so some rich dude can make some extra green.
===
they were told to keep their mouths shut, along with the firemen that found recordings of talks over their communicators (some kept quiet, others spoke out)
according to this theory they planted the bombs a week or so ahead of time before 9/11
===
QUOTE
Again, lies doesn't necessarily prove guilt.
===
it shows a cover up.
==
QUOTE
Also, they deported people who may have been involved with the terror plot. Doesn't exactly scream "they were in on it" to me. It just says "the US is getting people who may want to blow shit up as far away from the US as possible as soon as possible".
===
or they could contained them in a cell for interrogation
and the bush/bin laden family have history together
==
QUOTE
Governments can only get away with what you let them get away with.
Which is why it's fine for people to ask questions and such of their government to try to keep them in line.
It's just that 9/11 seems WAY beyond anything the government has even CONSIDERED doing, let alone done (at least as far as declassified documents and the occasional government employee turned whistle blower goes)
==
read my response with the 2nd quote
===
QUOTE
- As it has been pointed out, the Northwood event was a means of scaring people in believing and supporting a particular view. Wouldn't it be an interesting turn of event if it were for terrorists to ACTUALLY attack the US? No no, the US attacked itself, wasting truckloads of money, ruining lives, etc. Of course, you'll say people believed it back then, so why not now? Easy enough, there's a substantial amount of proof that say so. When you can do as much to say that the Government did it, we'll see.
====
im sure the goverment took a good chunk from the WTC's insurance policy
==
QUOTE
-Do you have anything, really, to base your claims on other than that botched website your school buddy and you threw together last night or that 3-hour-long biased rant?
==
biased? no.
im sure if you did take the time to look at my page you'd have found a good number of sources
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules