Some questions about... paranormal experiences... and stuff.

[Kazuya Mishima]

I beleive not.

I believe so...if you like we could have a poll and let the people decide.

[Corey]

I believe so...if you like we could have a poll and let the people decide.

lol. Go for it.

[Kazuya Mishima]

lol. Go for it.

Go ahead after all lady's first.

[Evans]

I beleive not.



Actually no. I can explain anything that happens to me. There are no ghosts.

I concur.

On topic: http://maxpages.com/mapit/THE_CANADI...LIP_EXPERIMENT

With other groups and in different locations, the same results were obtained.

[Corey]

I concur.

On topic: http://maxpages.com/mapit/THE_CANADI...LIP_EXPERIMENT

With other groups and in different locations, the same results were obtained.

That's interesting I guess. And Kazuya, grow up.

[Elmdor Rizer]

Tsk, I already settled your little issue so take it elsewhere.

I'd like to suggest http://www.mlparena.com/Forums.html. Thanks.

[Corey]

Tsk, I already settled your little issue so take it elsewhere.

I'd like to suggest http://www.mlparena.com/Forums.html. Thanks.

lol. Would I be a bad person if I goatse'd that forum?

[Elmdor Rizer]

I like to think they'd enjoy it.

On topic, no, no "parnomalia" whatsoever. I'm don't pay enough attention to notice weird shit, and when I actually do I like to think of normal explanations instead of sensational ones.

[Muay]

I like to think they'd enjoy it.

On topic, no, no "parnomalia" whatsoever. I'm don't pay enough attention to notice weird shit, and when I actually do I like to think of normal explanations instead of sensational ones.

Then how do you explain the Loch Ness Monster?Not so easy now huh?

[Elmdor Rizer]

Then how do you explain the Loch Ness Monster?Not so easy now huh?

I've never seen the Loch Ness monster..

Those blurry photos, you mean? Large birds and/or fingers infront of the camera.

[Mistral]

Then how do you explain the Loch Ness Monster?Not so easy now huh?

I've never seen the Loch Ness monster..

Those blurry photos, you mean? Large birds and/or fingers infront of the camera.

And in at least one case, an elephant. Funny, we found it quite easy.

As for the rest, I think most of it was covered. Basically, human brains and human senses are not nearly so infallible as some people would prefer, and people try to associate unfamiliar sensations or stimuli with supernatural causes if they cannot sense immediately a natural cause. It's nothing particularly special, kinda like seeing UFOs in lenticular clouds.

[Muay]

And in at least one case, an elephant. Funny, we found it quite easy.

Never knew elephants inhabited U.S. lakes, namely Lake Champlain.

[Skinner8]

Never knew elephants inhabited U.S. lakes, namely Lake Champlain.

DUN DUN DUNN!

[Corey]

Never knew elephants inhabited U.S. lakes, namely Lake Champlain.

That is a terribly beleivable picture. If thye can get these shitty grain shots from random poeple who just happen to be pointing a camera in that direction, how come scientists they have camped out there get a decent or atleast equal quality pic?

[Mistral]

Never knew elephants inhabited U.S. lakes, namely Lake Champlain.

Well, if you want to change the subject from Nessie to Champ, feel free, but don't pretend an answer to one is the answer to the other. Besides, there are plenty of other potential explanations. For Nessie, they include seiches or rotting pinewood, noting that sightings in the lochs occur only in the lakes with pine trees. As far as I can tell, the same trees grow along Lake Champlain, and the same seiches occur there. Still, I think the best quote is that by the sightings, Champ is a "chameleonesque creature that is black, gray, brown, moss green, reddish bronze or other color, and is between 10 and 187 feet long, with multiple humps or coils as well as horns or a mane or glowing eyes or 'jaws like an alligator'—or none of those features." If I had time...but I don't, so I'll just leave it at that for now.

EDIT: A slight bit more free time and no one posting in here in the interim means an addendum. I'm a little curious why you think no scientific inquiry or search has ever revealed Nessie or Champ, considering Lake Champlain at its deepest is only 122 metres, and averages less than 20. Loch Ness is significantly more at 233 metres, but has attracted quite a bit more attention as well. Here's another interesting bit of light reading. Here's a bit more, concerning what appears to be the very similar to the picture you posted, by coincidence.