Same cost as their 'top' PC (changing the setup inflates the cost further beyond reason), and you could assemble a computer with two CPUs, a 690, 64GB RAM, a 2TB HDD, and a Blu-Ray drive.
and even if i buy a new CPU, GPU, MoBo and RAM mine's still under a thousand.
Hell, having a good quad-core would be like the best thing on the planet for a dude like me.
But all that was overkill, I don't even think one would need 8GB of RAM let alone that squared
I'm looking into an Eight Core AMD one for my next build. Two of them and 64 GBs of RAM makes for one badass PC!
and even if i buy a new CPU, GPU, MoBo and RAM mine's still under a thousand.
I was making the point that you can get vastly superior specs for the same price, or just better specs for less. Once you drop below 1k, you're not going to best their top tier machine (lower end as it may be).
Getting around to it... | Available via Retroshare 16/7.
I'm looking into an Eight Core AMD one for my next build. Two of them and 64 GBs of RAM makes for one badass PC!
Video encoding programs and various CG related software is the only sort of sortware that will take advantage of that many cores, let alone multiple CPUs.
Getting around to it... | Available via Retroshare 16/7.
Video encoding programs and various CG related software is the only sort of sortware that will take advantage of that many cores, let alone multiple CPUs.
I forgot to mention this:
You.
Don't.
Need.
64GB.
Of.
RAM.
It's a waste of money, no normal task requires it.
Getting around to it... | Available via Retroshare 16/7.