
Originally Posted by
Mistral
I think you've got a pretty bad case of selection bias. The only stuff you're still going to see around after 20-30 years (or even longer, if you're talking about the 1960s) are going to be the things that seem unkillable, precisely because all of the stuff that broke after one or two weeks...well, broke. By contrast, you've still got all of the electronics made in the last year or two to pick from, including the dodgy stuff which will break soon and simply hasn't yet. Really, things nowadays are generally far more reliable than they used to be, dodgy practices like planned obsolescence aside. If nothing else, the transition from BJTs to MOSFETs for integrated circuitry, comprehension of thermal and mechanical patterns of breakdown, and the systemization and continuous application of modern QA processes has vastly improved reliability, in spite of vastly increased complexity that has drastically increased the absolute number of failure points in any given piece of technology. Who remembers when "Japanese" in electronics was a curse word?
And I have never seen a phone charger that broke after a couple weeks tops. Sure that isn't selection bias as well?
...
And no, I wasn't thinking "Back to the Future" when I remembered jokes about Japanese electronics. Well, maybe a little.