
Originally Posted by
Mistral
Which is why smallpox is still a persistent threat, and why we dropped off the Malthusian cliff two centuries ago. There's nothing two-edged about curing diseases, as far as I'm concerned. Even if other factors still exist that limit population growth, even if the disease does or does not eventually adapt to fight off the treatment (and it doesn't necessarily have to become more virulent to do so; that's a base misrepresentation), a step forward is still a step forward.
As for this story, it is a fairly interesting thing. It's obviously not the only thing necessary to cure AIDS, but identifying the structure of this retroviral cutting enzyme is likely to be quite useful in determining ways to combat HIV. And, considering this is general to retroviruses and not just HIV, it can be adjusted and tweaked, or simply generalized to suit any adaptions HIV may go through; it's not like a crow can become a chicken, after all, no matter how it's cooked.