The Korean Fan Death out: thats not funny guys cousin gerald died that way

[Kouen Hasuki]

I used to think most vid cards were shit when I was reading the benchmarks on sites, and I was more discouraged when I see that the ones in my hypothetical budget are absolute shit when running stuff like COD4.

Then I read those are tested in Ultra High settings in 1920x1080 or some shit like that. My monitor only goes to 1366x768. And I don't even need them to run in Ultra High. I think I'll go for a 4350 and another GB of RAM, my PC looks decent anyway...

if you can maybe go for the 4550 / 4650 the 43's arnt all that and would be a bit of a waste, 4550 / 4650 would suit your needs better at your res last time I tried a 4350 it struggled to even play Street Fighter 4 at min settings 800x600. you could probs find one cheap on ebay too

[Fer!]

4550 are slightly cheaper, the performance would suffer a bit or there isn't a lot of difference between each other?

[Kouen Hasuki]

4550 are slightly cheaper, the performance would suffer a bit or there isn't a lot of difference between each other?

Actually you would get a (id say) 15 to 20% faster framerate from the 4550

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....=585&card2=584

As you can see there there kinda the same except the 4550 has better bandwidth the 4650 would give an even better experience but if your on a tight budget id say 4550, if you can spare the extra bucks get a 4650

[Fer!]

I'm only interested on playing exclusive or really, really better versions of games in PC (yes, yes, all games are superior in PC, but for example I'll play Mass Effect and Battlefield in my Xbox rather than playing TF2 on it), mainly Starcraft 2, The Witcher and something else I'm forgetting about.

[Kouen Hasuki]

If ya would like you can post me the links to the cards your looking at if you want me to look em over

[Fer!]

Actually you would get a (id say) 15 to 20% faster framerate from the 4550

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....=585&card2=584

As you can see there there kinda the same except the 4550 has better bandwidth the 4650 would give an even better experience but if your on a tight budget id say 4550, if you can spare the extra bucks get a 4650

*sees shitloads of numbers

I'll trust in your judgement. I don't go all fancy on shit, I play on consoles ffs. I only want to run a couple of games I'm interested about.

[Kouen Hasuki]

*sees shitloads of numbers

I'll trust in your judgement. I don't go all fancy on shit, I play on consoles ffs. I only want to run a couple of games I'm interested about.

ok to put it easier go for at least the 4550, if ya can stretch it 4650. Forget the 4350 its horrible

[Fer!]

If ya would like you can post me the links to the cards your looking at if you want me to look em over

They're in Spanish, and try to ignore the price, I can't buy off from Newegg or something like that, and that's the best PC store I can get stuff from. I'd just like to know which one is the best budget card I can get out of these four.

1.
2.
3.
4.

The rest of my specs are 1GB DDR2 (planning to get another GB by the end of the month) and a DualCore 2.70Ghz.

[Fer!]

ok to put it easier go for at least the 4550, if ya can stretch it 4650. Forget the 4350 its horrible

Well, that narrows the search a little.

[Fer!]

Oh, and thanks for your help. Much appreciated.

[Fer!]

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Kouen again.

I miss the old vBulletin. ¬_¬

[Fer!]

A challenger appears.

[Kouen Hasuki]

this one

http://www.pcenlinea.com/mp/72551.html

Didnt know you was also looking at the 5450

This should give you what you need

[Kouen Hasuki]

A challenger appears.

Oh this is a toughter call 5450 vs 4650 id swing more for the 4650 personally though

Ya I say HD4650

[Fer!]

The 4650 is just a few bucks more expensive, and looking at some Youtube videos with that card in Starcraft 2 it looks pretty well for me.