View Poll Results: what do u think is it a good idea?

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • yay

    12 33.33%
  • nay

    14 38.89%
  • dont care

    10 27.78%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Parental Controls on Psx 3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Question Parental Controls on Psx 3

    Sony has Announced that they will begin adding a parental control feature on their new consoles

    http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7001215012

    ...........What do u think?
    Taken from here from which it came and used in such a way that i could only be a representation of what it was and where it came from.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I think it's a bad idea because, like the V-Chip, it's another "feature" that reduces the overall quality of the rest of system and/or increases the price of the product. What if we don't want to pay for the R&D for parental control software?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Granada
    Posts
    9,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
    EP Points
    5

    Default

    It's not a bad thing.

    It's in the Xbox, and the Xbox 360 and the it's anounced for the Revolution as well.

    It's a good way to keep the goverment off the ESRB and the Developers backs.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,038
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 333 Times in 106 Posts
    EP Points
    890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GundamGuy
    It's not a bad thing.

    It's in the Xbox, and the Xbox 360 and the it's anounced for the Revolution as well.

    It's a good way to keep the goverment off the ESRB and the Developers backs.
    As he said. And, if this can put idiots like Thompson in a semi quiet mode, maybe we'll all be better off in the end.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Close enough
    Posts
    24,624
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    EP Points
    30

    Default

    No doubt. I cant help but thing that those who say it's a bad thing fully understand the situation the industry is in right now. Self regulation is better than Government regulation, and if this helps get Clinton off of our backs, then great.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,038
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 333 Times in 106 Posts
    EP Points
    890

    Default

    Who do you mean by Clinton?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Ted
    No doubt. I cant help but thing that those who say it's a bad thing fully understand the situation the industry is in right now. Self regulation is better than Government regulation, and if this helps get Clinton off of our backs, then great.
    it has proven to not be effective self regulation though. But heck, if the people who try to enforce it are stupid enough to believe it works, keep at it. It's kind of like carrying around a Bible to avoid getting arrested for possession of crack.
    edit - and Hillary Clinton WILL make the situation much worse. Wish me luck on gaining citizenship in Switzerland.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Close enough
    Posts
    24,624
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    EP Points
    30

    Default

    http://www.gamespot.com/news/6140617.html

    There ya go. There's something about that story and stuff there. Not the whole story, but part of it. Yeah...

    Quote Originally Posted by CryixDijonrit
    it has proven to not be effective self regulation though. But heck, if the people who try to enforce it are stupid enough to believe it works, keep at it. It's kind of like carrying around a Bible to avoid getting arrested for possession of crack.
    Wow. That was a really shitty analogy.

    So you're saying that it's better to not have any self-regulatory measures in place, giving the politicians have more fodder for their anti-gaming agendas, than it is to expect parents to step up and take responsibility, thus taking a little bit of the heat of the industry? Ok then.
    Last edited by Cyberxion; 2nd-December-2005 at 03:07.

  9. #9
    Mikey_ Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evans
    Who do you mean by Clinton?
    hilary.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Ahem...Wrong forum. This belongs in General Gaming. Another mod please move this?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,038
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 333 Times in 106 Posts
    EP Points
    890

    Default

    What a whorrible person. (Clinton)
    Still, I have no problems with games rated M not being sold to children, and for those who do it to be fined. The parental control will be there, but most parents won't know about it. Nonetheless, that will be another countermeasure against excessive regulations. I hope.
    Last edited by Evans; 2nd-December-2005 at 03:17.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,903
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    EP Points
    5

    Default

    i couldnt give a toss because im 22.


    but i do think its an awesome idea ,


    all you frickin 13 year olds dont need to be playing gta

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Ted
    Wow. That was a really shitty analogy.

    So you're saying that it's better to not have any self-regulatory measures in place, giving the politicians have more fodder for their anti-gaming agendas, than it is to expect parents to step up and take responsibility, thus taking a little bit of the heat of the industry? Ok then.
    No, I had just said that is satisfies them but doesn't really get anything done. If parents really want to "protect" their children they'll remove the offending device(s). Ever hear of parents taking away their childrens' internet priviledges when they use porn? It's just like drug prohibition, without all the murderous side-effects, (oh wait cough -columbine- cough). Both sides win I guess.

  14. #14
    Mikey_ Guest

    Default

    thats right. damn 13 year olds.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Close enough
    Posts
    24,624
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    EP Points
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evans
    What a whorrible person. (Clinton)
    Still, I have no problems with games rated M not being sold to children, and for those who do it to be fined. The parental control will be there, but most parents won't know about it. Nonetheless, that will be another countermeasure against excessive regulations. I hope.
    Exactly my point.

    Even if it's not used, that Sony is including Parental Controls in the PS3 should serve to show these overzealous politicians that the industry is interested in policing itself, insofar as it's trying to put the choice of what kind of games are appropriate for their kids directly in the hands of the parents, rather then having the Government make that choice for them.

    Quote Originally Posted by CryixDijonrit
    No, I had just said that is satisfies them but doesn't really get anything done. If parents really want to "protect" their children they'll remove the offending device(s). Ever hear of parents taking away their childrens' internet priviledges when they use porn? It's just like drug prohibition, without all the murderous side-effects, (oh wait cough -columbine- cough). Both sides win I guess.
    Parental controls are a measure that allow parents to keep the "offending device" while removing what's so offensive about it out of the equation. Since gaming isn't just for kids anymore, it's not too far-fetched to believe that mommy and daddy might want to get in on the fun as well, while keeping their kids from playing their copy of some odd M-rated game. They'd be able to do that with the parental control options built into the PS3.

    I dont see much of a reason NOT to include them in the PS3. They're there if you wanna use 'em, and you can ignore 'em if you dont. Maybe if you could prove conclusively that their inclusion in the PS3 would cause the system's price to rise substantially, then maybe you'd have a case. I wouldn't wanna pay for something I wouldn't use. However, unless that's the case, then I think it's great that Sony is taking that measure, much like NINTENDO is with the Revolution...

Similar Threads

  1. PSX Emulation
    By jbenitez in forum Everything Emulation
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2nd-August-2005, 10:39
  2. Having PSX Emulator Troubles
    By Darth Magus in forum Everything Emulation
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2nd-January-2005, 20:59
  3. Here's my request list & share list
    By venge55 in forum ROM & ISO Requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2nd-May-2004, 18:30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us

We are the oldest retro gaming forum on the internet. The goal of our community is the complete preservation of all retro video games. Started in 2001 as EmuParadise Forums, our community has grown over the past 18 years into one of the biggest gaming platforms on the internet.

Social