
Originally Posted by
Castlevania
No, but instead of aiming it at civilian settlements indiscriminately, they could've organized their attacks much better... Hiroshima and Nagasaki might've been of strategic importance to Japan, but destroying the whole city...? Not good...
A government's gotta save face... Back then, we didn't have humanitarian organizations protesting against war, but even so, wiping out a whole city "in the name of war" has never been acceptable... If it were you out there, or your family, you'd be moping about it...
But yeah, such are the privileges of living under the wing of a super echonomic power... Funny, that... =P