Kerry will have my vote on this cuz I think everything is better then bush
( I haven't been here for a time so if this tread is already made somewhere ...just close this one then )
John Kerry
George Bush
I won't vote on this
Kerry will have my vote on this cuz I think everything is better then bush
( I haven't been here for a time so if this tread is already made somewhere ...just close this one then )
Last edited by djnickname; 4th-March-2004 at 08:45.
meh
I'd vote for a goat over Bush. It doesn't even have to be a talking goat. I figure at least the goat couldn't possibly make the US relations with other countries any worse, as opposed to Bush, who can and will.
-Mason Gray: Less vowels, same great consonant taste.
Im with Maison on this one, bush is a complete and utter toss, through and through... honestly, i dont really care. who ever wins, wins. if they blow up the world, the fine. just leave me blissfully ignorant...
I'd vote for Kerry, because i think anyone is better than Bush.
I'll go with Kerry or Maison's goat. anything else than Bush
_______________________________ ____________________
I voted for Kerry here, but in reality...I want myself to be president. *laughs evilly*
If I were an American living in the USA, I'd vote for that Kerry fellow.. for .. obvious reasons..
"Violence is always the answer. If you somehow believe violence is not the answer, you are asking the wrong questions. If violence is not solving your problems then you're not using enough of it."
Visit my Deviant Art Gallery here:http://sspirate.deviantart.com/gallery/
lol who exactly is going to seriously vote for George doubleya.
The other blokehas to be better if heturns out not to be something realy needstobe done
(\__/)_/)
(O.o ).^)
(> < ) <)
Now we know how viral bunny signatures really spread.
i'd probably vote for kerry....but either way this country is still going to hell in a hand basket, might as well not have a president that will piss everyone off. of course kerry might do the same thing because we have the worst foreign policy ever.
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/bctbasser/yumero.html">My Trading List</a>
-- System Specs --
Windows XP Home
Intel Pentium 4/3.0Ghz
128Mbs ATI Radeon Mobility 9700
80 gig hard drive
1 gig DDR RAM
I would vote for Bush if I could. I frankly dont think hes done that bad of a job at all.Originally posted by Norgus
lol who exactly is going to seriously vote for George doubleya.
The other blokehas to be better if heturns out not to be something realy needstobe done
Saddam was a monster, he initiated costly costly attacks on foreign countries. The Iranian war hundreds of thousands died before Iraq finally pulled out, poison gas was used in many attacks on Iranian civilians. The Geneva Convention clearly states that prisoners of war should not be harmed in any way, yet Saddams military executed thousands of Iranian prisoners as a matter of policy. In the "Anfal" campaign Iraq dropped poison gas on the Kurdish city of Halabja, killing thousands, mostly civilians. He has also in southern Iraq executed thousands of Shi'a Arabs.
The economy has grown the most it has since Reagan.
And although Kerry is better with tax cuts that Dean, Bush is still the best in this. Tax cuts help the economy, it gives more money to the citezins, and the citezins will spend that money, making money circulate, thus making the economy better.
Anyways, thats my .02$
I'm voting for my Sex Queen Maison Gray for President, i mean Kerry. !!!
I completed the internetz
Kerry would get my vote if i could voteOriginally posted by Midor
Kerry will have my vote on this cuz I think everything is better then bush
( I haven't been here for a time so if this tread is already made somewhere ...just close this one then )
I dont know too much about him, but everything beats bush
I'm sorry, but I don't want Kerry to win so that he can weaken our military with spending cuts. I also don't want Kerry to be the Prez because he'll leave our national security matters to the UN. The UN security council is hypocritical because............
Russia didn't go to the security council to get approval for their Chechen campaigns.
France didn't go to the security council when they sent troops into the Ivory Coast.
Syria is a terrorist sponsor and is unjustly occupying Lebanon.
Therefore, calling Bush a "rogue Fascist unilateral cowboy" is wrong because he spent half a year making his case for the war to the security council. There is proof that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction at one point, but you people would rather give Saddam the benefit of the doubt instead of Bush.
Good points, havent thought about that.Originally posted by reagan80
I'm sorry, but I don't want Kerry to win so that he can weaken our military with spending cuts. I also don't want Kerry to be the Prez because he'll leave our national security matters to the UN. The UN security council is hypocritical because............
Russia didn't go to the security council to get approval for their Chechen campaigns.
France didn't go to the security council when they sent troops into the Ivory Coast.
Syria is a terrorist sponsor and is unjustly occupying Lebanon.
Therefore, calling Bush a "rogue Fascist unilateral cowboy" is wrong because he spent half a year making his case for the war to the security council. There is proof that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction at one point, but you people would rather give Saddam the benefit of the doubt instead of Bush.