I'm not up to trying to explain where I was coming from again. You have yourself convinced that numbers can't prove anything, and I've given you valid examples of how they can based on the movie you yourself brought up. At any rate, I'm through discussing this with you. Whatever.Originally posted by Johnny Wonderpants
Hey, how'd you get your post above his?
Anyway, what I'm saying has nothing to do with how many people went to see it and how long it kept selling well. The quality of the film never changes, no matter how many people go to see it, no matter how many people think it's good, no matter how many people think it's shit, it always stays the same, right? So the numbers don't have anything to do with how good the film is.
That's all I'm saying, not that Spiderman didn't deserve the numbers, or the praise, just that numbers don't prove anything...