But tass, it's 2016.Originally Posted by Tassadar
Background wise I think she makes pretty good sense. She has a pretty lengthy track record of political involvement, both direct and indirect. She's easily one of the most qualified candidates across both parties for the job of president. Now whether or not her track record is super great is another matter entirely. But I don't see her flubbing anything super hardcore due to "not understanding how shit works". Which was sort of Obama's problem in many ways. Guy clearly wasn't prepared for how dirty top level politics is.
She seems a lot more genuine as "a female political candidate" than, say, Palin. Who just straight up didn't belong anywhere for any reason other than being a woman and being the hardcore mudslinger that McCain generally tried not to be.
Also with Clinton she's just very unlikable. She's always come off as a total angry bitch to me. But when talking about modern american politics that might be an asset in-office. But I don't think it's going to win her many fans on the campaign trail.
