The Black-out: Black boxes ALL UP IN THIS PLACE!

[!nstaGib]

Horrendous shooting mechanics. Boring missions with no real objectives. Ugh.

Yeah. It had some decent ideas behind it, but it felt very rushed, and the controls were just bad.

[Spose']

It is underpowered because Nintendo didn't see the appeal of HD gaming. It tops out at 480P... The Gamecube could do 480P. More than four fifths of the games are shovelware, regardless of which method of acquisition you want to include (VC, WW, Retail). Is it innovative? sure it is, but I have two in this house and I play neither.

Also, notice how most of the games on your list barely use the motion aspects at all? The biggest reason for the console existing and some of the best games on it can forgo that aspect entirely.

They all have it but its not the major part. They have their effect, No More heros for finishers chains and High/low attacks. Mario for side things. They all ahve their small uses.

[Spose']

I never said the console was awful, only that the library was limited.

Meh i would say a bit over half are playable. But the other half i havn't tooken a look at. There are some really stupid game like Sports and Tennis.

[Spose']

How said game got past quality control is beyond me.

Lots of bribe cookies? I couldn't even play that game without being pissed. Horrible AI was a horrible selling point i could of dealt with some bad controls but no the AI was useless.

[!nstaGib]

It is underpowered because Nintendo didn't see the appeal of HD gaming. It tops out at 480P... The Gamecube could do 480P. More than four fifths of the games are shovelware, regardless of which method of acquisition you want to include (VC, WW, Retail). Is it innovative? sure it is, but I have two in this house and I play neither.

Also, notice how most of the games on your list barely use the motion aspects at all? The biggest reason for the console existing and some of the best games on it can forgo that aspect entirely.

I never understood that. Same can be said for the DS. If Nintendo feels confident enough to put these features in their hardware, and advertise them, then why don't they stick to their guns and at least use it in their own software titles? Not to mention, it just wasn't accurate enough.

[!nstaGib]

No, the game isn't any better like that. The engine is booty. That's what wrong with the game.

Not to mention, the single player was just a copypasta multiplayer with horrible AI

[screwed]

[Spose']

I never understood that. Same can be said for the DS. If Nintendo feels confident enough to put these features in their hardware, and advertise them, then why don't they stick to their guns and at least use it in their own software titles? Not to mention, it just wasn't accurate enough.

They use them both for smaller stuff, the touch screen has been used quite a bit

[Knightshade]

Hey Spose three way MTG going on now Shard vs Gypsy vs TRS in EDH.

[!nstaGib]

They use them both for smaller stuff, the touch screen has been used quite a bit

But surely you see what I'm saying, no?
In the Mario games on the DS, the touch screen was nothing more than a stapled on gimmick...

[Spose']

Hey Spose three way MTG going on now Shard vs Gypsy vs TRS in EDH.

I guess i should spectate might make me cheer up. Sister has been a annoyance all day.

[Spose']

But surely you see what I'm saying, no?
In the Mario games on the DS, the touch screen was nothing more than a stapled on gimmick...

Yeah it seems most other companies besides nintendo like using it but nintendo can't be asked.

[Knightshade]

well the game is still fairly fresh if you want to spectate

[Knightshade]

teamspeak is also up on the monster server if you want to join up to you though

[Drageuth]

I am sooooo not backreading 480 new Hang Out posts. You all can go fuck yourselves.