I just prefer bin/cue files. I'm using Isobuster now, what program do you guys recommend? Is there a difference? A CD image is the same regardless of what software you used, right?
I just prefer bin/cue files. I'm using Isobuster now, what program do you guys recommend? Is there a difference? A CD image is the same regardless of what software you used, right?
I use Nero 6. Haven't had any problems with it yet.
Maybe CDRWin will be good for this. I haven't burned any ISO's yetOriginally Posted by Grim_Reaper
cause I don't have a PSX.
As for .bin files I think there are few kinds of those files
(at least CDMage is avaliable to open few kinds of .bin fiels) so
I think there must be some difference between them.
Nero 6 can make bin/cue files?
i don't think it can. not sure. i use ultraISO for making images. uISO makes'em in many diff ways like bin/cue, mds/mdf, iso, etc. not all image making programs work well. i used to use WinISO for making images of PSX games and i noticed that my ePSXe just had a blank screen with every image i'd boot up. i switched to uISO and made the images the same way and they worked for some odd reason.
i use clone cd for psx images or any discs on the pc that are bootable. clonecd does a fine job in copying that boot area compared to isos.
bin/cues from cdrwin are good.
i use nero to burn but i dont use it to make images-never like it.
i hate working with alcohol cos i always run into problems with them.
isos are fine for program cds that arent bootable but the images created tend to be bigger than the actual cd itself.
preferred choice: clonecd!
I Use CDRWin as the trial version is actually better (forces to lowest cd speed)
I use fireburner for bin/cue
I prefer Alcohol 120%. I have never had a problem with it, and it works on other kinds of CDs as well besides PSX. My next favorite program would have to be ISOBuster for making ISOs.