The Hangout: Now our history is for sale. And for that, I apologise.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

3rd-October-2007, 00:58
Panda Man

read ma last post nub :P HIS fubbared up their descriptions.
3rd-October-2007, 00:59
polobunny

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

read ma last post nub :P HIS fubbared up their descriptions.

How is that my problem, nub? :shrug:
3rd-October-2007, 00:59
Sprung

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

Wait, some later versions of the 9250 have 9.0 something support. I won't know unless you can tell me the manufacturer.

The 9250
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=4765188

EDIT: it's 8.1

The X1300 is a true ATI, as far as I know...
3rd-October-2007, 01:00
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

How is that my problem, nub? :shrug:

Your Canadian, no?
3rd-October-2007, 01:01
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sprung

The 9250
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=4765188

The X1300 is a true ATI, as far as I know...

hum no HIS fubbared their descriptions, all 9250s are 8.1 ;)

Also that is incredibly over priced.
3rd-October-2007, 01:02
Sprung

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

hum no HIS fubbared their descriptions, all 9250s are 8.1 ;)

Also that is incredibly over priced.

Probably...mine's actually 128MB too. I bought it over a year ago for about that same price.
3rd-October-2007, 01:03
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sprung

Probably...mine's actually 128MB too. I bought it over a year ago for about that same price.

a year ago, a 128mb version should have been around $30-40 I'd say.
3rd-October-2007, 01:04
Sprung

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

a year ago, a 128mb version should have been around $30-40 I'd say.

I don't doubt that...but at the time I needed one :shrug:
3rd-October-2007, 01:05
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sprung

I don't doubt that...but at the time I needed one :shrug:

newegg, NEWEGG! :P
3rd-October-2007, 01:05
polobunny

Oh and dude, WTF?
FX5XXX were all 9.0b, including the FX5900 and FX5950.
Even my mom knows that shit >:
3rd-October-2007, 01:08
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

Oh and dude, WTF?
FX5XXX were all 9.0b, including the FX5900 and FX5950.
Even my mom knows that shit >:

Please explain to me how an FX 5600 released in march of 2003 would have DX 9.0b capabilities. 9.0b wasn't available until August 2003 :P

EDIT - I'm probably wrong in think 9.0a too, every review is just saying "DirectX 9.0," released Dec 2002 :P
3rd-October-2007, 01:15
polobunny

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

Please explain to me how an FX 5600 released in march of 2003 would have DX 9.0b capabilities. 9.0b wasn't available until August 2003 :P

Then you should explain me how the fuck the GeForce 8800 GTX got out the same day as Vista "beta" in November.
I knew those guys at nVidia were fast, but that fast? ;P
3rd-October-2007, 01:16
Panda Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by polobunny

Then you should explain me how the fuck the GeForce 8800 GTX got out the same day as Vista "beta" in November.
I knew those guys at nVidia were fast, but that fast? ;P

Because DX10 was available in November :P
3rd-October-2007, 01:16
polobunny

Besides, DX9.0a is like the forgotten version of DX9 :P
3rd-October-2007, 01:17
polobunny

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panda Man

Because DX10 was available in November :P

Okay so Vista gets out on November 8th. Then Geforce 8800 GTX gets out a few hours later.
Those japs will never cease to amaze me.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT. The time now is 23:06.