Magic: The Gathering

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Wyrm

I don't even know that format. :ignore:

EDIT: Reading up on it.

---

Wow man, that seems really interesting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Wyrm

Wow man, that seems really interesting.

---

I like it, you get access to almost the entire MTG library (save for some legacy bans and other miscellaneous stuff), buuuuuuuut only one of each.

I have my first actually good deck :) 3 total games won now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Wyrm

I don't even know that format. :ignore:

EDIT: Reading up on it.

---

It's the format of kings.

@TRS: The bans are pretty reasonable, as much as I love Sway of the Stars.

@Spose: ORLY?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gypsy

It's the format of kings.

@TRS: The bans are pretty reasonable, as much as I love Sway of the Stars.

@Spose: ORLY?

---

I like the format, fuck you Sway of Stars though. :ignore:

Wyrm ran off somewhere, I got dragged into the game in his stead :wacko:.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shardnax

Wyrm ran off somewhere, I got dragged into the game in his stead :wacko:.

---

What?

Time to go through 154 pages of cards to make sure I didn't miss any delicious spells.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRealSpiders

What?

Time to go through 154 pages of cards to make sure I didn't miss any delicious spells.

---

Wyrm and Spose were going to play a 3 player with my brother, I got roped in because Wyrm went somewhere. Searching through hundreds of pages, fun :awesome:.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shardnax

Wyrm and Spose were going to play a 3 player with my brother, I got roped in because Wyrm went somewhere. Searching through hundreds of pages, fun :awesome:.

---

And I already found a good inclusion, Army of the Damned, PERFECT FOR MULTIPLAYER.

Use a narrow deck meant for 1 v 1 games in a 3 player game. EFF YEAH.

I lost in style though, I'll take it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gypsy

Use a narrow deck meant for 1 v 1 games in a 3 player game. EFF YEAH.

I lost in style though, I'll take it.

---

GYPSY WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL ME THINGS LIKE NEW BLOCKS EXIST? :fist:

I'm still in the A's of my search, this could take a while. Luckily it's Sunday and I have nothing better to do. :wacko:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shardnax

Wyrm and Spose were going to play a 3 player with my brother, I got roped in because Wyrm went somewhere. Searching through hundreds of pages, fun :awesome:.

---

we had a disagrement about if this card

http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers...0214&type=card

would stop monsters from attacking because if it didn't stop creatures from attakcing and heal him he would of lost.

no hate either way.
and i added a few cards in the deck ment to be anti his.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spose

we had a disagrement about if this card

http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers...0214&type=card

would stop monsters from attacking because if it didn't stop creatures from attakcing and heal him he would of lost.

no hate either way.
and i added a few cards in the deck ment to be anti his.

---

Wait, what about Purity now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRealSpiders

Wait, what about Purity now?

---

I had a line of creatures attakc and he said it ment all the damage they would do become HP so +19 health instead of -19

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spose

I had a line of creatures attakc and he said it ment all the damage they would do become HP so +19 health instead of -19

---

Yeah you'd still do damage, Purity only applies to non-combat damage. When in doubt about the wording or mechanics of a card check Gatherer.