Your rep power is 19.Quote:
Originally Posted by Necrosnake
I still have the rep faq Xena wrote before the rollback if anyone wants it.
Printable View
Your rep power is 19.Quote:
Originally Posted by Necrosnake
I still have the rep faq Xena wrote before the rollback if anyone wants it.
Ugh, how can anyone honestly use Foobar2000?
[awaits retaliation]
It's slightly lower on system resource usage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kenney
slightly.
I'll stick to my "resource hog" winAMP.
Thanks.
With the few plug-ins I installed; foobar was using more resources than Winamp. Lastly, the customization isn't intuitive, it's border-line headache inducing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray.
Why doesn't my onboard graphics support 128mb?
I can go from 8 -> 16 -> 32 -> 64mb that's it.
Because it doesn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
You don't need 128 for onboard anyways.
Because your onboard only has 64mb?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
True.Quote:
Originally Posted by Panda Man
Will 64mb actually run any games... So far it seems this 64mb onboard is better than my 128mb Ati radeon 9250... N64 games play a lot smoother, better graphics. Same with PSX games. I'm yet to try a PC game though.
You shouldn't be able to get a resolution over 1024 x 768. Maybe 1280 x 1024 in windows. What kind of onboard is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
obtw
9250 was a low end card
very low end
about 3 generations ago.
1280 x 768 is my resolution.
My monitor's really crappy.
My motherboard's an ABit PC-95
Yeah I'm aware the card sucks, but it was better than onboard I was sure. But I've been proven wrong.
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht
Just not pretty, nothing too recent, and don't expect perfect framerates the whole way through.
Is that Half-Life 2 out of the question?