Pedophilia, molestation, etc.

Fact: The majority of terrorists in the world are Muslim.

So...going on the basis of how this thread has become (gays rights and tolerance/intolerance of such) I have a proposition.
I propose that Muslims not be allowed to marry. Eliminate Muslim marriage and we eliminate a large amount of Muslim following people being born which would extremely cut down on terrorist activity. Mind you, different than the argument of whether or not gays are born gay, Muslims are definitely not born Muslim. They may be born into a Muslim family but they can choose to be Catholic or Buddhist or whatever they want so they have no rights as Muslims to marry or have 'civil unions' since Muslim is a choice. Considering how Muslims mass murder innocent people with terrorists attacks, this must the best solution.
I also propose that Muslims shouldn't be allowed to kiss in public or express their beliefs on why they believe they have rights. To think that such murderous people could kiss, which leads to touching and eventually sex, is extremely disturbing and to propose they have the same rights as everyone else is absolutely ludicrous since they kill people who don't believe as they do.
At this time and at no time in the future should Muslims be allowed to be on television shows since this would only be propoganda for their terrorist activities by trying to convince people that their way is acceptable.
Muslims should also never be allowed in any type of church or temple other than their own since they would be looking at people of other religions and possibly trying to convert them, much the same way people fear gays in a locker room.
And finally, when Muslims are in public, they have to act in a non Muslim manner so as to fit in with all those who aren't and not make non Muslims feel threatened or confused by their ways

(None of this truly how I feel, but reading back what all this says shows me just how stupid it sounds. I look at individuals...of any race, religion, sex, sexual preference, age, or upbringing as just that, individuals. In regards to the few comments here in this thread about what the bible says...there may be one line saying 'man should not lie down with man' but there are hundreds saying don't judge others.)
*Hugs*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Allea

there may be one line saying 'man should not lie down with man' but there are hundreds saying don't judge others.)
*Hugs*

---

so then the bible contradicts itself. and the high and mighty religious folk here at EP go by that? LOL funny shit. :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Allea

In regards to the few comments here in this thread about what the bible says...there may be one line saying 'man should not lie down with man' but there are hundreds saying don't judge others.)
*Hugs*

---

Silence, don't question the word of God! All faggots shall burn in hell! God speaks through me!

Okay, I'm done, that wasn't even enjoyable...I'm not sure why I did it. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xaenn

Silence, don't question the word of God! All faggots shall burn in hell! God speaks through me!

Okay, I'm done, that wasn't even enjoyable...I'm not sure why I did it. :(

---

All bow before Zod! Zod sees all! Zod knows all! Zod made all! But, Zod needs you to go and whack anyone who disagrees with him, since he can't seem to do it himself.

Same reason I thought it (I'll be frank, I actually posted it only because you did it first, though)?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by feradais

Is homosexuality wrong and unnatural?
The second half, is the bible says so, and whether you do or not, i believe the bible to be the word of god. Or at the very least, a damn good advisory.

What about gay marriage?

I dont agree. The bible says, and remember this is just what i believe, that a man should not lay down with another man,

---

If you are Jewish than that is an understandable sentiment. If you are Christian then that is an ignorant pile of BS. Homosexuality is prohibited in Laveticus. This prohibition is included with a great many ritual cleanliness laws that were related to the Covenent between YHWH and the Isrealites.
To a Christian, Old Testament laws are as relevent as Green Eggs and Ham. Due to Christ's sacrifice on the cross Christians live in Grace, not Law. All that is required is that one accept Jesus as Savior.

Quote:

---

Therefor, if being homosexual is wrong, it is worse that a nation legalize it, considering that would make us all accountable ( i think?).

---

Spiritual authority and temporal authority don't mix well. When the temporal authority pretends to know the will of God it simply profanes God. When the spiritual authority pretends to know what is best for a society it only causes hardship and suffering. This is why the governments of most civilized nations are secular.

Marriage is a civil contract in the eyes of the temporal sword and a spiritual contract in the eyes of the religious authority. While the religious authority has every right to deny the spiritual side of a union for religious reasons, the civil authority should not and must not deny the civil side of the contract for religions reasons.

Quote:

---

I also dont believe in it simply because It makes me angry. I am so sick and tired of homosexuals wollowing in thier own self pity, declaring that they do not have the same rights as i do. Exscuse me, since when is it legal that i marry a man? oh thats right, i cant. We have equal rights, i cannot marry a man, a man cannot marry me, just as a woman cant marry another woman.

---

By that logic, Jews has equal rights in Nazi Germany because Nazis would be sent to Concentration camps if they converted to Judaisim. The fact is that you don't want to marry a man and you are prefectly free to marry whomever you will want to marry.

Quote:

---

And not only that, But marriage has been around for a very long time, and i realize that change is not always a bad thing, in this case it is. Homosexuals wish to change the constitution ( i believe thats where the laws of marriage are, if im wrong im sorry), inserting words and altering americas perception on marriage.

---

The Constitution doesn't say a motherfucking thing about marriage. It is neoconservatives and religious extremists who want a marriage Amendment.

Quote:

---

They want legal rights, they want the state to recognize them as a couple, as legaly married, they want benefits. Well, If homosexuals are aloud to change words in the constition, whats to stop the bigomists from coming in and saying " hey, that got to change words, why cant we?" Sounds like a little kindergartner doesnt it? Well we as american are all spoiled, we are all kindergartners. America is a land of equality and fairness, for all. Yet, it seems to me that lately, its only about fairness for a few. If we open that door, we better be ready to welcome in the whole party. And i know what some of you are thinking "omg this asshole is an idiot, bigomists? what next beastilists? pedophiles?? stupid asshole your a hateful bigot". well im glad you(I) brought that up. See, if homosexuals are aloud to change the word woman to man, and man to woman, whats to stop bigomists from adding the words, man to woman to woman, or man to man to man? and pedophiles, man to child, woman to child? And then what? weve changed words already, how about adding some? man to horse? woman to dog? Yet agian i can just imagine what your thinking " OMG he took that seriously, animals? what a fucking douche? People can think and consent, animals cant" well thats true, we can think, but it seems lately we are choosing not too. If you were to tell someone 200 years ago that one day our streets would be filled with drugs, prostitutes, homosexuals, and machines capable of flight, they would have put you in an insane aslyum. We are experiancing a decay, a slow one, but a dangerous one.

---

The slippery slope argument? It goes both ways, you know. If we don't recognize homosexual marriage then we may just start to slide backwards and the next thing you know interracial marriage wil be illegal. Then All interfaith marriage will be illegal. Then they'll start outlawing certain religions.

Of course, the slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy. If you try to use it in a serious debate the logic police will come and sodimize you with a broomstick.

Marriages between adults and children?
I hate to break this to you but in most states you can already marry an underaged teenager with parental consent. Of course, consumating that marriage may conflict with age of consent laws depending on the jurisdiction. This puts such marriages in a wired legal position but the current trend is that such unions are becoming less acceptable.

Marriages between humans and non human animals are about as likely as martians destroying the Earth with a giant ball of Pistachio ice cream. Unless the non-human partner can speak The King's English it ain't gonna happen.

It is unlikely for polygamy to be legalized any time soon due to the insular and isolationist nature of polygamist communities. Members of these communities simply don't lobby or talk to the press. Those that leave are generally miffed due to percieved or actual abuse and lobby against polygamy.

The secular and new age Polyamory movements are less insular than the fundamentalist polygamist movements but they are also less serious. They do very little lobbying and tend to stay out of the press. For the most part, they don't even want marriage.

Quote:

---

We are losing our morals, our character, and what has held our country together for so long, fear of god and sin.

---

Fear of God? I always understood that the point was love of God. There is no sin when love is properly directed toward God. Fear is counterproductive.


Someone has probably already posted this but there are more than 1,00 rights granted exclusivly to married couples that couples who simply live together do not get.

http://scribbling.net/1049-federal-r...marital-status

Denying the legal marriage to dame sex couples denies them all off these rights.

I don't think everyone is going to understand what you just said.

Oh btw, go here, if you want to know about "gay" stuff.
http://forums.emuparadise.org/showpo...&postcount=727

On pedophiles I simply point you to the retardedness of NAMBLA, and the fact that despite being one of the most used threats ever no one has ever actually put someone into a rocket and fired them at the sun. Join the dots here people.

As for the teaching thing I believe most people are in the profession because of the job incentives other than molesting children. Be it the pay, the holiday, the sense of acheivement, whatever.

And I couldn't be bothered to read past the first page of the thread so um, sorry if these arguments have already been had and shat :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThugMaloy

I'm not even going to bother arguing with Evans (mainly theres no point since your arguement is so flawed/contradictory).

---

"Hush, little dummy, don't be a turd, nobody cares if you utter not a word..."

Do enlighten us on how it is so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThugMaloy

A person becomes gay by choice. However, they don't simply wake up and say I'll be gay. It can take several decades before a person who has become gay to even realizes/accepts themselves being gay (yes due to social pressure I will accept that).

---

Silly believer, dogmas are for idiots.
You seem to be speaking from experience. Are you?
If they become gay by choice, what sparks that change? A bitchy wife? Some additive in Pepsi? The lust for hairy asses? What? The fear of having kids (which one can easily remediate to by finding a woman with such desires, or lack thereof) ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThugMaloy

Saying your born gay is simply another excuse. Which if accepted allows (to get back on topic) anyone to argue that they are the way they are due to genetics so a pedophile can simply post a pointless article on dom/rec genes to avoid any guilt.

---

Avoiding guilt does in no fucking way diminish the fact that he forces himself onto children. It would still be illegal. Taking your statement further would brew up some idea that if there is a violence gene, a man could be forgiven when beating his wife to a bloody pulp every week, or when killing some dude on the street for his wallet.
Errr, yeah, sink with your boat, ThugMaloy.

If there are evil or bad/mean genes, would that excuse the fact that I'm mean? No, though I can decide to restrain myself, I find it hard to, it's in my nature, so to speak. *waits for some dimwit to come around with the asshole gene*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThugMaloy

I'm done with this topic since I'm sure Evans will banter the same useless arguement while talking down to anyone who objects much like the government.

---

Seems I'm not the only one using teasing repartees here, now am I?
Useless? Oh, sorry for not finding those in the Bible or just some unproven misconception of reality based on abject pure ignorance. Truly am.

Apparently Jesus when in for a bit of man love, you know.

And as for paedophilia - a terrible perversity that should be punished in the harshest way possible. Current laws (in the UK at least) are far too lax on the perpetrator of the crime, with judges often taking a sympathetic view and implying that paedophilia is some terrible affliction, as opposed to the sexual depravity it quite clearly is.

The worst thing is, most paedophile released go on to re-offend. Seems that jail is no deterrent whatsoever, not at least when the sentences handed out are so paltry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clive

Apparently Jesus when in for a bit of man love, you know.

And as for paedophilia - a terrible perversity that should be punished in the harshest way possible. Current laws (in the UK at least) are far too lax on the perpetrator of the crime, with judges often taking a sympathetic view and implying that paedophilia is some terrible affliction, as opposed to the sexual depravity it quite clearly is.

The worst thing is, most paedophile released go on to re-offend. Seems that jail is no deterrent whatsoever, not at least when the sentences handed out are so paltry.

---

Same here, if that's somewhat of a comfort, that is regarding the way they are treated by the judicial system, not the torturing them part.

i had a vice-principal that was feeling on boys










It was a guy

For some reason I could have sworn that that previous post was going to be a joke.

My sick, sick mind.