If I was old enough, I'd vote for G Dubs.
Printable View
If I was old enough, I'd vote for G Dubs.
Your statement about being wrong either way doesn't make any sense...Quote:
Originally Posted by leatherman
You can't just bring up your "just cause" whenever it is convenient.
I said and I quote meself.."If the no. of deaths really counts which country's 'rule' is better then, I seriously would say Iraq" That is a statement made by me on a previously stated hypothesis made by you (I've quoted you below, just incase your memory abandoned you). I don't believe that the no. of deaths caused by a country should/shouldn't determine the adequacy of the country to govern. I only made that statement to show you that the US has killed the same amount if not more people ever since it's existence. I think it was an inane speculation you made in the first place. Have I ever indicated that the "US forced Saddam to kill 250,000"? And I will repeat myself...the reason why the kurds and the shi'as rebelled was because they were told they had US support, but that never materialized. That's non-action, which is where the US has to be blamed. One of the reasons Saddam went to war with Kuwait was because the US had done nothing to stop him or even condemn him when he had used chemical weapons against the Kurds in 1988 in Halabjah.Quote:
Originally posted by leatherman
Yeah you just said Saddam's rule is better than the US's and an unpartisan person would figure out that you are wrong. Feel me? Did the Us force Saddam to kill 250,000 people? If you answer no, then you are wrong, if you answer yes, you are still wrong because the US didn't force Saddam to do it. Umm....and you last statement about no. of deaths determining which countries rule is better....yeah your wrong on that too. Congrats you managed to be wrong three times, but i will give you this, at least you tried, and thats what really matters.
That's where I said the US was at fault.
An unprejudiced (btw-there's no such word as 'unpartisan') person would think I were wrong, eh? Well, then you have no business telling me I am wrong:P But criticism is good, thankyou.
I only wonder how I'm wrong either way...please explain.
You really do get immense pleaure in telling me I'm wrong...atleast tell me why I'm wrong:P
I wasn't the one who made the statement about the no. of deaths making a country good/bad...
Ring a bell?Quote:
Originally posted by leatherman
It has a little over 22 million people. Saddam killed 250,000 kurds. US hasn't killed that much. Thus making US's rule better than that of Saddam. Feel me?
DO i get pleasure from saying you are wrong? No i would feel better if you were right. You were wrong about the US killing more people then Saddam. And that 250,000 people figure was just a one time thing. He has killed many people before and after that. I don't think that Iraq invaded Kuwait because the US didn't condemm them, they went into Kuwait to get richer, you know for oil. And Saddam finally got his :dance:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingy