Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 56789101112131415 LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 222

Thread: what does everyone miss about the old days of gaming?

  1. #136
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    18,582
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 91 Times in 61 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    EP Points
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deathzero021 View Post
    i miss... the FUN... oh and platformers. (not to mention arcades and points!)
    Can't say I really miss the arcade and points systems, but I do miss the platformers. A lot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Timburger View Post
    Yeap, I miss platformers too. Super Mario Bros., Adventure Island 2, Rockman 5... Oh the nostalgia! They were fun and challenging, mainly because there are no save or auto-save features like we have nowadays. Hell, by the time the Playstation came out I was still playing the NES! Hahaha.
    Fuck. When the PS3 came out, I was still playing my NES. Still do. I think it's got Megaman 3 in it right now.

  2. #137
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Fuck. When the PS3 came out, I was still playing my NES. Still do. I think it's got Megaman 3 in it right now.
    lmao me too. seeing as i just finally got my hands on an original NES i've had to deal with emulation the whole time! of course, i have had SNES, GENESIS and such since they came out, don't know why it took me so long to get an NES =\

    but yeah, defiantly the platformers. platformers were the main genre back then, like how FPS's are today - only platformers left room for more originality and creativity with different characters, enemies, worlds, plots, etc.

  3. #138
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I miss the button mashing that came with 2D fighting games. Now there's hardly any old school fighters anymore.

    Click to hear the objection!

  4. #139
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    828
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarianoRyu View Post
    I miss the button mashing that came with 2D fighting games. Now there's hardly any old school fighters anymore.
    This doesn't honestly make sense. There's no new old school fighters? What?

    If you're saying that fighting games are dead, I say look at Street Fighter 4 and MVC3.

    If you're saying that more fighting games need to be 2D, well okay then. It's not like they play any different though, since the gameplay is still strictly on a 2D plane.

  5. #140
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I miss the button mashing that came with 2D fighting games. Now there's hardly any old school fighters anymore.
    Soul Calibur, Takken, Virtua Fighter aren't good enough? not to mention Marvel VS Capcom as well.

  6. #141
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deathzero021 View Post
    Soul Calibur, Takken, Virtua Fighter aren't good enough? not to mention Marvel VS Capcom as well.
    I said 2D, that was the main idea. I enjoy playing Tekken and Virtua Fighter, but it's not the same as playing Street Fighter II or the original Marvel and Capcom crossovers. And don't get me started on King of Fighters. It all went to hell after 2001.

    Click to hear the objection!

  7. #142
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I said 2D, that was the main idea. I enjoy playing Tekken and Virtua Fighter, but it's not the same as playing Street Fighter II or the original Marvel and Capcom crossovers. And don't get me started on King of Fighters. It all went to hell after 2001.
    i actually like the newer fighting games more. they're more complex, so the competition is a lot better. as for 2D, yeah the style is cool but i don't see anything wrong with 3D. i think there are a few 2D fighting games for the NDS.

  8. #143
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deathzero021 View Post
    i actually like the newer fighting games more. they're more complex, so the competition is a lot better. as for 2D, yeah the style is cool but i don't see anything wrong with 3D. i think there are a few 2D fighting games for the NDS.
    I don't see anything wrong with 3D either. But I'm a nostalgic person, that's why I miss 2D. Besides I think simple is better, but then again, it's my own opinion.

    Click to hear the objection!

  9. #144
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    828
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarianoRyu View Post
    I said 2D, that was the main idea. I enjoy playing Tekken and Virtua Fighter, but it's not the same as playing Street Fighter II or the original Marvel and Capcom crossovers. And don't get me started on King of Fighters. It all went to hell after 2001.
    2001 broke KOF. But 2002 fixed it. Then 2003 broke it again, although I personally love 2003.

  10. #145
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    2002 and 2003 were O.K. XI sucked, and I haven't played XII due to not having a PS3 or 360. But the best games were '94, '96, '97, '99 and 2000.

    Click to hear the objection!

  11. #146
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    828
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarianoRyu View Post
    2002 and 2003 were O.K. XI sucked, and I haven't played XII due to not having a PS3 or 360. But the best games were '94, '96, '97, '99 and 2000.
    Honestly, compared to XII, XI is gold.

    XII sucks so much. The graphics are great, but the gameplay is bleh, and the AI is atrociously awful at its job, even on the hardest difficulty.

    XIII, however, looks amazing.

  12. #147
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shareware View Post
    Honestly, compared to XII, XI is gold.

    XII sucks so much. The graphics are great, but the gameplay is bleh, and the AI is atrociously awful at its job, even on the hardest difficulty.

    XIII, however, looks amazing.
    And what's worse, XII is a DREAM MATCH.

    '96 and 2000 will always be untouchable. Not even 98 Ultimate Match or 2002 Unlimited Match can top their greatness.

    Click to hear the objection!

  13. #148
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    18,582
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 91 Times in 61 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    EP Points
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deathzero021 View Post
    lmao me too. seeing as i just finally got my hands on an original NES i've had to deal with emulation the whole time! of course, i have had SNES, GENESIS and such since they came out, don't know why it took me so long to get an NES =\

    but yeah, defiantly the platformers. platformers were the main genre back then, like how FPS's are today - only platformers left room for more originality and creativity with different characters, enemies, worlds, plots, etc.
    My NES is still running wonderfully, 20 years later.
    Kind of wish I hadn't sold off most of my collection to pay for baby stuffs. It was getting pretty fuckhuge, I have to admit. My NES still gets the most play out of all the systems in my house (PSX, PS3, SNES, Genesis, N64, Gamecube, and plethora of handhelds). I boot it up about three times a week, minimum.

    I agree, though, platformers were the shit. I've never had more fun than I do playing old-school platformer games. I don't know why, because while the worlds and enemies and whatnot could change, everything else was very formulaic. Run, jump, attack, die, repeat until you can beat the level without getting hit or dying. Onto the next level.

    Then again, some of them were also so difficult that it's become a point of pride to attempt to beat them, now. Like Battletoads, and Ninja Gaiden. And Shadow of the Ninja, although I haven't dedicated nearly enough time to that one to actually figure out just how difficult it is. And the original three Castlevania's -- although, to be honest, I haven't given Simon's Quest too much attention, because I just can't quite get into it. But it took me damn close to 15 years to beat Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse, and when I did I was oh-so-proud. (Fucking Medusa Heads)

  14. #149
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Then again, some of them were also so difficult that it's become a point of pride to attempt to beat them, now. Like Battletoads, and Ninja Gaiden. And Shadow of the Ninja, although I haven't dedicated nearly enough time to that one to actually figure out just how difficult it is. And the original three Castlevania's -- although, to be honest, I haven't given Simon's Quest too much attention, because I just can't quite get into it. But it took me damn close to 15 years to beat Castlevania III: Dracula's Curse, and when I did I was oh-so-proud. (Fucking Medusa Heads)
    lol i found CV3 to be way easier then the first Castlevania - fighting Dracula in the end... man... still brings nightmares to me lol. Dracula in CV3 was funner and more interesting but it was easier, which i liked.

  15. #150
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    18,582
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 91 Times in 61 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    EP Points
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deathzero021 View Post
    lol i found CV3 to be way easier then the first Castlevania - fighting Dracula in the end... man... still brings nightmares to me lol. Dracula in CV3 was funner and more interesting but it was easier, which i liked.
    I was the exact opposite, and I don't know why. I had no trouble with the first one, but found the third one to be the most difficult. Then again, when I started playing the third one, I was about... 5 years old. And the first time I played the first one was when I was 15. So I'm sure a lot of my childhood tactics are getting in my way.

    I really want to boot those games up now. Hmm. I should see if I can get my NES hooked up through my EasyCAP for some LP works. NES GAMES WITHOUT SAVE STATES, BITCHES! (I'm looking at you, Ray. )

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3925
    Last Post: 8th-September-2007, 22:25

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us

We are the oldest retro gaming forum on the internet. The goal of our community is the complete preservation of all retro video games. Started in 2001 as EmuParadise Forums, our community has grown over the past 18 years into one of the biggest gaming platforms on the internet.

Social